Archives Posts
Can Chance Produce Information?
I don’t think chance can produce information. In a comment on HH’s blog, I came up with an argument which I’d never really heard before. I want to know what you think.
Can chance create meaningful information?
How would it be distinguished from meaningless garbage? To illustrate what I mean, consider the Library of Babel: Jean Luis Borges wrote a short story in which every possible book, ie every possible combination of letters, was contained in an infinite Library (which represents the Universe). Every truth was contained in the Library, but maddeningly the library is useless for finding truth.
This is because, in the extraordinary even you found a book that wasn’t filled with nonsense, it could just as well be garbage as truth (and statistically it’s a good deal more likely to be the former). It’s a great story, I recommend reading it.
My point is that even if chance could produce ‘information’ it would be indistinguishable from junk, and so would not be information. This would be so except when some other information was available for use as criteria – and, ironically, if and only if that other information did not arise by chance (because if it was produced by chance the other criteria would itself be indistinguishable from the myriad of other, similar but junk criteria. In fact, there would be infinite sets of junk ‘information’ and matching criteria, both for and against).
What do you think? If you can spot a hole in it, I’d love it if you pointed it out. (HH?)
was even a word. What were jokes then? They were connections to other people, conversation starters, and entertainment.

